| |
|
GTM
Test Day at Summit Point
Jan 7,
2005 Summit Point Raceway, West Virginia |
| |
|
|
| |
|
We traveled to Summit Point Raceway in West Virginia to conduct functional
and performance testing on the FFR GTM prototype. We also took the time
to evaluate a newly minted set of Bilstein “Challenge Series” shocks. The
following is the report of the testing and what was learned. |
| |
|
Date:
January 7, 2005
Location:
Summit Point Raceway, WV
Attendees:
Jim Schenck, FFR Lead Development
Mike
Pisani, FFR Engineering
Bryan Dobyns, BDM Racing
Dave
Smith, FFR President
Test Sessions:
9:00 am to 5:00 PM Closed Track
Conditions:
45 degrees F, partial Cloudy, dry surface
Vehicles:
FFR Challenge Series Car #210
FFR Challenge Series Car #77
FFR Challenge Series Car #1
FFR Type 65 Coupe #65
FFR GTM Prototype #3 Chassis
Goals:
1.
Test and determine final selection of new Challenge Series issue
Bilstein Shocks.
2.
Perform initial track testing and functional testing on new GTM
prototype. |
| |
|
Report:
We arrived at the track at
8:00 am and met Bryan Dobyns from BDM Racing. Bryan is a good friend and
an accomplished driver who was hired by the development team leader Jim
Schenck to help with the Bilstein shock selection on the challenge cars
and with early testing and development of the GTM chassis and suspension. |
| |
 |
 |
 |
|
Two trailers, five cars and a day of open track testing… This is a
good day job! |
|
| |
|
It took an hour or so to
un-load and set-up the tent, heaters, tools. The weather was cool with
temperatures in the mid 40’s. The skies were generally clear to partly
cloudy. Other than being a bit cool, the weather was ideal. Throughout
the late morning and early afternoon the sun would poke through the clouds
every now and then, warming up the surface and making for a fine test day.
We really considered ourselves lucky as the day was the only clear/warm
day between three days of rain and slop.
We were able to get on the track at 9:00 am sharp. The first order of the
day was to complete testing of the third revision of new Bilstein shocks.
These are not the same Bilstein shocks that are standard on the street
cars. The Challenge Series shocks (or rather the Bilstein shocks that we
want to begin using on the Challenge Series cars…) have different
compression and different rebound valvingsettings. |
|
|
|
| |
|
We brought two Challenge
Series cars outfitted with these newest Bilsteins (car # 77 and #210) and
one car with the current Pro-shock set-up (car #1).
After an hour of testing, both drivers (Jim from FFR and Bryan from BDM)
agreed that the new shocks were an improvement. Testing notes have the
drivers reporting the shocks are more consistent and predictable.
|
| |
 |
 |
|
Dobyns rips off the last turn onto the front straight. FFR owner
Dave Smith took the chance to wring out his silver Coupe. |
|
| |
|
The conclusion of the test
team is that they want to try one more small change in rebound setting
before final selection. If all works out, these shocks MAY be ready for the
2005 season. Stay tuned to the new Challenge Series website (www.ffrchallenge.com)
for news on these shocks.
With the Bilstein testing
out of the way, the team turned it’s focus to the GTM. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Initially Jim took the car
out for some easy laps and to make sure everything was tight. After 8-10
laps at increasing pace, Jim was satisfied with the car and ready to begin
testing.
We made changes to the car
throughout the day. There were some gremlins in the form of a leaking coolant
line plug and a loose front aluminum shroud. No extensive suspension
adjustments were made. Most of the testing evaluations were qualitative
to simply give us an initial feel for the car. No performance numbers
were recorded (braking, acceleration, etc).
Test notes are as follows… |
| |
|
…“surprise that the car
is a lot further along than we were thinking… this with very minimal
set-up work.” “The basic physics of the chassis is solid, really good.
The car feels really low slung… feels like driving a shifter cart.”
“Center Rear view mirror placement is no
good, need better rearward visibility, raise rear window and increase
opening size”…
“Front nose lip (trailing
edge) is too high. Increase forward visibility maybe less radius and/or
by dropping hood height”…(note: this has been lowered in the production
car.)
…”shifter linkage works but needs
improvement (note: this has been updated in the production car), trans is great… hook-up out of corners is fantastic”…
“…Cool conditions
eliminate significant temp evaluation… fairly quiet in cockpit, engine
sounds transmitted are welcome and not too high”.
“…Brakes work well, front
end has some bumpsteer (this was not measured or adjusted for prior to the
test)”…
Jim
Schenck
FFR Development Engineer in
Charge of GTM Project |
| |
 |
 |
|
The coolant hose leak was one of the very few gremlins we met through
the day. |
|
| |
|
We really were pleased with
the car at it’s first track test. There were some things that need to be
changed as well as some pleasant surprises. We didn’t expect to be
driving the car WOT in fourth gear at 120-130 mph on the straight, nor was
sliding the car sideways thru the carousel on the agenda for the very
first test, but as the chassis was a lot closer than we guessed, Jim
decided to push things just a bit.
There was no expectation
that we would get any high speed testing done as this is too soon for
that, besides, the entire rear tail section of the car is currently being re-shaped
and that wasn’t the goal of the day.
We have work to do at this
point on both changes that resulted from the initial testing as well as
normal production tooling work that continues. Major work remains in the
shaping of the new rear-end clip, the roll-up windows, dash and door
liners, as well as small tooling and jigs for the chassis and
sub-assembly.
Good news from the test day
is that we are closer than we expected to be at this time. We’ll be
returning to the track for more sessions in the coming weeks and we’ll
release news as we get it. Stay Tuned!
Factory Five Racing, Inc.
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |